Allotment conundrum

It’s always good to see the late Nobel laureate Elinor (Lin) Ostrom mentioned in the press, and quite surprising to see a reference to her in The Economist.  Lin was a great scholar of the commons and founder of the International Association for the Study of the Commons.

The Economist ran an article on 5 October, ‘Allotments: garden state’.    It starts by observing rightly that allotments began as relief for the poor.  Under the Small Holdings and Allotments Act 1980 a local authority must seek a plot of land for an allotment if six or more people request one.  Now there are only about 300,000 allotments left with a waiting list equivalent to half of them, and supply of new plots is inflexible.  Only 1,950 new strips of land have been set up by councils in the last two years, and a typical one costs the council £2,000.

Allotment in Mansfield, Notts. Photo: Mansfield District Council.

Allotment in Mansfield, Notts. Photo: Mansfield District Council.

The Economist, predictably, suggests that the solution is to create a market by increasing the rents to reflect the scarcity, deterring the uncommitted gardeners and encouraging councils to protect the allotments from developers.  The Economist seems to think that by creating a market it creates democracy, but only those who can afford it can take part—which is a long way from the ethos of allotments.

However, at this point The Economist changes tack.  It acknowledges that ‘allowing wealthy gardeners to queue-barge would run against the spirit and history of the allotment movement’.  And then it introduces Lin Ostrom, pointing out how ‘her work shows how common resources can be sensibly managed without using prices’.

Lin Ostrom, photo: Guardian

Lin Ostrom, photo: Guardian

In 1990, in her book Governing the Commons, Lin challenged the popular theory in Garret Hardin’s 1968 article ‘The tragedy of the commons’ (Science, 13 December 1968) that depletion of shared resources is inevitable because each user competes to win a greater share for himself.  Lin argued, empirically, that communities will sustainably manage common-property resources through locally-devised institutions regulating use.  

This is all pithily related in Tim Harford’s article, ‘Do you believe in sharing?’ in FT Magazine, 30 August 2013.  As I said when I received the Elinor Ostrom Award on behalf of the Open Spaces Society last June, Lin was an optimist, she saw the best in people.  She firmly believed that the norm is for people get along together and share a limited resource equitably—and she had plenty of evidence to prove it.

Back to The Economist, the article concludes that Ostrom’s solution is happening already in some places, such as the Conservative-run Barnet Council, which signs leases with societies rather than tenants and lets the gardeners run their sites.

All this is fine as far as it goes, but I still don’t see how we can ensure that the allotments are matched to those who genuinely need them.  Would that Lin Ostrom was still with us to help us solve this conundrum.


About campaignerkate

I am the general secretary of the Open Spaces Society and I campaign for public access, paths and open spaces in town and country.
This entry was posted in Elinor Ostrom, green spaces, International Association for the Study of the Commons and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Allotment conundrum

  1. There could be a role for either local cooperative provision (perhaps cloud-funded) or other institutions like credit unions might get involved if they were imaginative. There is the Federation of City Farms and Community Gardens, encouraging groups to rent land. I like the cooperative or commons approach, but it was not ever so. Back in the 19th century, agricultural union leader Joseph Arch was against them as poor relief, arguing for better wages, and John Stuart Mill called them “the poor growing their own poor rate”.

  2. Thanks for your thoughtful response Jay.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s