A new inclosure-movement?

A century and a half ago we thought the inclosures were coming to an end—about the time that the Open Spaces Society was formed.

Indeed, I said as much in Japan to an international audience on commons, and commiserated with those nations that are going through the pain we suffered in our inclosure movement: wild land developed or fertilised, rivers dammed for reservoirs, forests felled, indigenous communities dispossessed.

In reality, we now face a revival of the inclosure-movement.  The list of the government’s anti-green attacks on access and open spaces lengthens by the day.

Mean-minded attack
The planning minister Nick Boles (who led the mean-minded attack on village greens in the Growth and Infrastructure Act 2013) now clearly favours the dilution of national park authorities’ planning powers to prevent locally-backed development.

The Edale valley, Peak District National Park

The Edale valley, Peak District National Park

And the environment secretary Owen Paterson is trying to move the goalposts to enable more development in national parks in exchange for something called ‘biodiversity offsetting’.  

On coastal access, the ex-environment minister Richard Beynon wobbled last summer when he told farmers at the Royal Cornwall Show, in a bizarre metaphor, that it ‘was a sledgehammer to miss a nut’.  He then refused to extend coastal access to the Isle of Wight, claiming it was ‘not a priority’.

Bossington Beach, Exmoor National Park, near the start of the South West Coast Path.

Bossington Beach, Exmoor National Park, near the start of the South West Coast Path.

The government has made it even harder to register land as greens in England, with new regulations which favour landowners and developers.  Worryingly, the Welsh Government is considering similar moves.  We still have no news about how to win ‘Local Green Spaces’—or even if they will be worth winning.

Now the Minister of Justice wants to emasculate judicial review because of its alleged impact on ‘economic recovery and growth’.  His proposals would make it much more expensive and difficult for voluntary groups to go to court against misconceived development.

There have been many times when the society, the Ramblers, the British Horse Society and others have taken court action to uphold the public’s rights or to save paths and spaces. Such action is a last resort for us, if only because of the cost, but our freedom to take it is of paramount importance.  Is there anything this government won’t do to ease the way for the developers to make more money?

This is all deeply depressing—but remember, the Open Spaces Society successfully fought inclosure more than a century ago, and we will again.


About campaignerkate

I am the general secretary of the Open Spaces Society and I campaign for public access, paths and open spaces in town and country.
This entry was posted in Access, Defra, green spaces, Japan, National parks, open spaces, planning and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to A new inclosure-movement?

  1. Reblogged this on Over The Hills and commented:
    This is very alarming!

  2. keithbadger says:

    The inclosure-movement ultimately let us into the factory and industrial model where people we’re cut off from the natural world; a paradigm shift that haunts us even more now than yesteryear as the cyberspace, synthetic, antiseptic paradigm holds even greater sway over our culture today. Somewhere, at sometime, someone will have to say NO more. It’s just as insidious, or perhaps even more so, on this side of the pond.

  3. backpackbrewer says:

    Thanks for the blog entry Kate, its opened my eyes to something I shamedly admit I had no knowledge of previously. Keep up the good work

    I’ll reblog this on my blog too

  4. backpackbrewer says:

    Reblogged this on Backpackbrewer's Outdoor Blog and commented:
    Please take time to read this entry by Kate on the potential further loss of our green areas. I have to admit to being unaware (but not surprised) of such moves afoot behind the scenes of the murky world of planning and politics

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s