An unstable proposal

On 15 February Wycombe District Council planning committee will decide an application to ‘convert’ a stable into a two-bedroom chalet-style bungalow. The stable is near the top of a hill, opposite Beeches Farm, in the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.  

The application includes the creation of a parking and turning area, the removal and replanting of hedgerows, a new garden, and a storage shed.  The first application was withdrawn in January 2016 and further work was done on it before it was resubmitted.


The simple stable, seen from the footpath

The stable (grid reference SU 791 8870) is at the eastern end of the long Hambleden footpath 17 which runs up the valley to the stable at the top.  If the development goes ahead, the applicants will want to divert the footpath so that it loses its lovely, purposeful, direct route.  It would then join Colstrope Lane, beyond the development, on a dangerous slope with limited visibility.

There are nearly 40 objections, mostly from local people but including Hambleden Parish Council, Ramblers, Open Spaces Society and CPRE.  Unfortunately the officer, Alastair Nicholson, is recommending conditional approval.

Our district councillor Chris Whitehead, has made some powerful points.  He argues that ‘an ancient public footpath traverses the land, with stunning views over distant hills’.  He points out that this is ‘a new build masquerading as a conversion’.

I strongly hope that the officer’s recommendation is overturned and the development is thrown out.


The hill below the stable

Update: the application was refused.


About campaignerkate

I am the general secretary of the Open Spaces Society and I campaign for public access, paths and open spaces in town and country.
This entry was posted in AONB, Chilterns, Open Spaces Society, Public paths, Ramblers, walking and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to An unstable proposal

  1. Paul Partington says:

    Planning officers, I often wonder if they have fully thought through the consequences/situation. Needs lots of lobbying at committee. Experienced a planning officer in Taunton Deane, he was not aware of public rights of way and impact of views. He had recommended approval. Fortunately the application went to the planning committee who overturned the recommendation. Lots of lobbying against the application which the planning committee members listened to. The applicant appealed. PINS Inspector”s site visit, I was able to point out my points made in my submission. She took a lot of time in walking the public rights of way and seeing the impact the development of a solar farm would have.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s